Search for: "Ex parte Givens"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2010, 2:22 pm
The blog 12:01Tuesday discusses the BPAI decision Ex Parte Hughes.Of the obviousness component, from KSR: “Common sense teaches . . . that familiar items may have obvious uses beyond their primary purposes, and in many cases a person of ordinary skill will be able to fit the teachings of multiple patents together like pieces of a puzzle. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:52 am
The employer made several equitable requests ex parte. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:18 am
The court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment of no willful infringement of plaintiff's flush valve patent based on the PTO granting defendant's ex parte reexamination request. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 1:23 pm
Following up on an earlier post, this week the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted relief in Ex parte Gabriel Gonzales, 2006 Tex. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm
Especially given this wrinkle and the potential effect that a refusal to pay may have on US-French relations, the prosecutor insists that ex parte consideration of such motions in inappropriate. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:17 am
The first of those cases was Givens v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:55 am
KSR is invoked in Ex parte CHALLENER :Notwithstanding Appellants’ arguments (see also Reply Br 2-3), our reviewing court guides that “when a patent ‘simply arranges old elements with each performing the same function it had been known to perform’ and yields no more than one would expect from such an arrangement, the combination is obvious. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:15 am
Ex parte appeals are no different. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:49 pm
Footnote 5 of Ex parte Kissel is of interest: The Examiner stated in the Answer that “[e]very ground of rejection set forth in the Office action from which the appeal is taken (as modified by any advisory actions) is being maintained by the examiner except for the grounds of rejection (if any) listed under the subheading ‘WITHDRAWN REJECTIONS’” (Ans. 3). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
RGB had earlier sought ex parte reexamination of the same patent based upon the same prior art now applied in the district court proceeding. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:15 am
Apple raised concerns of due process implications of ex parte communications and their impact on its trial. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Request Ex Parte Patent Reexamination, Lose, Repeat For Patent Owners, one of the more frustrating aspects of ex parte patent reexamination is that the experience can be never ending. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:01 am
Details: Ex parte Rykowski Appeal 2009003868, Appl. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:44 pm
The Court did note some hesitation with handling this ex parte:The Court notes that it does have certain misgivings about whether Plaintiff met its burden regarding the propriety of ex parte relief here. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:12 am
Ex parte Levy, 17 USPQ2d 1461, 1464 (Bd. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:51 am
GmbH as a Possible Trademark Troll The post Judge Hammers SEC for Lying to Get an Ex Parte TRO–SEC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
” Ex Parte Proceeding Meant Parents Not Notified These parents were never notified of “proceedings,” learning about the first ex parte proceeding only after a judge denied the hospital’s request for authorization to treat. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
” Ex Parte Proceeding Meant Parents Not Notified These parents were never notified of “proceedings,” learning about the first ex parte proceeding only after a judge denied the hospital’s request for authorization to treat. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:19 am
Therefore, the court limited plaintiffs’ counsel’s ex parte communications with plaintiffs’ treaters “to discussions of the facts of treatment that the given treating physician provided to the given plaintiff and the plaintiff’s medical condition and history. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:44 pm
The Court did note some hesitation with handling this ex parte:The Court notes that it does have certain misgivings about whether Plaintiff met its burden regarding the propriety of ex parte relief here. [read post]
