Search for: "FCA Holdings, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 362
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2023, 3:28 pm by Melissa Revuelta
On October 17, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan announced that IPC Hospitalists of Michigan Inc. has agreed to pay a total of $4,384,618 to settle allegations of violating the False Claims Act (FCA). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Amazon.com, Inc., 2023 FCA 165 at para 47. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:36 am by Geoff Schweller
On August 28, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Washington announced that Lincare Holdings, Inc. agreed to pay $29 million to settle charges that it violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by overbilling Medicare and Medicare Advantage Plans for oxygen equipment. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:52 am by Olivia K. Plinio
SuperValu Inc., consolidated from two lower court decisions, involved allegations that the defendants, two retail pharmacy chains, overcharged the government for prescription drugs in violation of the FCA. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:00 am by Olivia K. Plinio
Supreme Court unanimously settled a long-standing dispute over a subjective versus objective standard for scienter under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s own subjective belief is relevant to scienter, rather than what an “objectively reasonable” person may have known or believed. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm by Javier Dominguez
Their petitions had effectively been in a holding pattern awaiting the high court’s decision. [read post]
Executive Health Resources Inc., held that the Government may seek dismissal of a False Claims Act (“FCA”) qui tam suit over a relator’s objection so long as it intervenes in the litigation, either during the initial seal period or afterward. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:15 am by admin
Executive Health Resources, Inc. today, holding that the government must intervene in a False Claims Act qui tam case before moving to dismiss it over the whistleblower’s objection. [read post]