Search for: "FRIEND V. FRIEND" Results 21 - 40 of 16,521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2016, 7:31 am by John McFarland
But every rule should have its exceptions, and I want to brag about Graves Dougherty’s representation of the Friends of Lydia Ann Channel. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 9:14 am by Eric Goldman
Feb. 25, 2025) The post Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to “Refer-a-Friend” Text Message–Jensen v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:43 am
Murray (by his litigation friends, Murray and another) v Express Newspapers plc and another [2007] EWHC 1908 (Ch D) “Routine activities conducted in a public place, such as walking down the street or visiting the shops, did not attract any reasonable expectation or guarantee of privacy so that an individual who had been photographed in a public place could not rely on the right to respect for his private and family life under art 8 of the European Convention for the… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:12 am by sally
Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) [2011] EWCA Civ 1257; [2011] WLR (D) 325 “In determining whether or not there was a deprivation of liberty, it was legitimate to have regard both the objective ‘reason’ why someone was placed and treated as they were and also the objective ‘purpose’ or ‘aim’ of the placement. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
[T]the "false friend" cases appear to rely on the logic of Hoffa v. [read post]
In a nutshell, here are the top 10 types of amicus briefs that can help “friend” the Supreme Court: 1. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:06 am
Roult (by his mother and litigation friend) v North West Strategic Health Authority [2009] EWCA Civ 444; [2009] WLR (D) 164 “There was no power pursuant to CPR r 3.1 in the context of personal injury litigation to vary the terms of a settlement where there had been an unforseen event which destroyed the assumption on [...] [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:26 am
Bailey (by her father and litigation friend) v Ministry of Defence and another [2008] EWCA Civ 883 “Where medical science could not establish the probability that ‘but for’ an act of negligence an injury would not have happened, but could establish that the contribution of the negligent cause was more than negligible, the ‘but for’ test was modified and the claimant would succeed. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:25 am
In Matter of Friends of Stanford Home V. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:17 am by sally
Regina (SA (A Child) (by SH as litigation friend)) v Kent County Council (Secretary of State for Education, intervener) [2011] EWCA Civ 1303; [2011] WLR (D) 326 “The obligations imposed on a local authority in certain circumstances pursuant to section 23(2) and (6) of the Children Act 1989, relating to the provision of accommodation and/or maintenance for certain children in need and being looked after by the authority, were to be considered as alternatives, rather than as… [read post]