Search for: "FTC v. Actavis, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 9:55 pm
Actavis, including insight from an FTC speaker concerning how the FTC has applied the decision to various settlements. [read post]
28 May 2014, 10:31 am
In FTC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:30 pm
Actavis, Inc. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:09 am
In Pandora Media, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In FTC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Cotter, University of Minnesota Law School asks FTC v Actavis, Inc: When is the Rule of Reason Not the Rule of Reason? [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:37 am
On June 17, 2013, in FTC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:03 pm
Actavis, Inc., No. 12-416 (U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [5] Citing FTC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [5] Citing FTC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [5] Citing FTC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
In Descamps v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:11 pm
Actavis, Inc., No. 12-416 (U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:03 am
Actavis Inc., Gera Vaz, Jon Leibowitz, Lateral Hiring, Lateral Moves, Laterals, Linda C. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Actavis Inc., Generic Drugs, Intellectual Property, Matt Kaiser, Monopoly, Patents, Pharmaceuticals, SCOTUS, Settlements, Supreme Court [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
[National Law Journal] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Arizona, Attorney Misconduct, Barack Obama, Biglaw, Clifford Sloan, Crime, Davis Polk, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Edward Snowden, Election Law, Federal Trade Commission, FTC, FTC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Actavis, Inc. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:45 pm
Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. ____ (2013) by Aaron F. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
The five-to-three decision in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
