Search for: "Falls v. SS"
Results 21 - 40
of 214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2008, 7:55 am
This is an outlook that not even the Supreme Court intended in R. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 3:37 pm
In this post, Eilidh Douglas, Senior Associate in the ICE Disputes team at CMS, previews the case of Republic of Mozambique v Privinvest Shipbuilding SAL (Holding) and Ors, which was heard by the UK Supreme Court on 24 and 25 January 2023. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 2:18 am
In giving the lead judgment Lord Hodge stated that, against the background of the other relevant provisions of ICTA, the court concluded that s 103 does not contain an implicit restriction so that the charge to tax on post-cessation receipts falls only on the former trader whose trade was the source of the income. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am
Under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“TULRCA”), s. 146, workers are protected against detriments falling short of dismissal related to taking part in the activities of an independent trade union at an appropriate time. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:29 pm
Relying on Hall Street Associates, LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:25 pm
BGE 117 V 153 E. 2c S. 156). [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:06 am
That was the question which fell to be decided recently in SXH v CPS. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:53 am
179(2), rather than ss. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
In Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:57 am
In this case, the accused was found falling asleep in the driver’s seat. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:57 am
In this case, the accused was found falling asleep in the driver’s seat. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am
An offence involving low culpability and low harm will fall into band 1A. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Not all cases can be funded, and even meritorious cases may fall outside the scope of the scheme. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:53 am
Heffernan v LB Hackney [2009] EWCA Civ 655 is a timely reminder of the importance of having evidence to substantiate a claim for damages. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:27 am
Zwar bestimmt sich das Recht gemäss der Lehre (das BGer macht sich diese Ansicht hier allerdings nicht ausdrücklich zu eigen) im Fall einer Nachlassspaltung grundsätzlich nach IPRG 91 I, um eine einheitliche Rechtsanwendung sicherzustellen. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am
In respect of the former, his Lordship referred inter alia to the decisions in Sentges v. [read post]
