Search for: "Fast v. Fast"
Results 21 - 40
of 6,781
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 6:30 am
The Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order in Palkon v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:30 am
The Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order in Palkon v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 23, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:16 pm
In Eisenhauer v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:00 am
Nix v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
The efficient markets hypothesis is over 50 years old.Basic v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am
Cline’s counsel (perhaps unwisely) spent the large majority of his time trying to convince the Court that the LP Agreement “was not signed” by Cline, an argument going nowhere fast. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
Fast forward to 1995. [read post]
14 May 2024, 12:33 pm
Oasis Tooling, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
On May 7, 2024, the FCC released a Declaratory Ruling reclassifying “broadband Internet access service” (“BIAS”) as a “telecommunications service” subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC under Title II of the Communications Act. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
” “The Court stated that while ‘there is no hard and fast rule that requires financial advisors to always disclose the specific amount of their fees from a counterparty in a transaction,’ the question is subject to a materiality standard. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:00 am
Wayland v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:54 am
Bierly v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:56 pm
[2] Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:20 pm
³ See, D’Amore v. [read post]
