Search for: "Field v. Freedman"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2007, 4:53 am
For the first time we also took the group on a field trip during the week. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:54 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:09 pm
Freedman, Maurice A. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
See also El v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Circuit’s al-Bihani v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
Id. at 896 (citing Freedman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
Freedman, Harvard University Press, 2013, Pages 387. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
Beecher-Monas Proposes to Abandon Common Sense, Science, and Expert Witnesses for Specific Causation
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm
It is not all about putting a DSM-V diagnosis on the chart, and prescribing medication. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:59 pm
Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
12 May 2013, 7:47 am
Cranor, “Milward v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
