Search for: "Fitch v. Justice Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch (2015), which increased the protection given to a Muslim wearing a head scarf; and Smith v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 1:26 pm
” Gershengorn comes into the position at an unusual time, with the Court missing its ninth Justice. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Debbie Kaminer, Religious Accommodation in the American Workplace: The Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision in EEOC v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of California in Winn v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:26 am
Also pending before the Court is Heffernan v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
Pinette, (1995) (opinion of the court)City of Boerne v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:28 pm
In today’s case (Park v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
Arbino v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
On 18 November 2015, the Administrative Court gave judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast ([2015] EWHC 3322 (Admin)). [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:53 am
Fitch, Taft Stettinius and Hollister, LLP, Columbus, for Petitioner American Municipal Power. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:31 am
In the Supreme Court decision of Oncale v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:40 pm
In today’s case (Park v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:16 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in EEOC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 3:54 am
” At The Labor Dish, Katherine Liao discusses the Court’s recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 12:36 pm
Supreme Court’s June decision in EEOC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:22 am
In Painer, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) applied Infopaq interpretation of the originality requirement, i.e. that a work must be the author’s own intellectual creation and bear his/her own intellectual input, to photographic works. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
In the Stanford Lawyer, Jim Sonne discusses the Court’s recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
In EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch, the High Court reversed a 10th Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that favored an employer's right to uphold a corporate dress code; in this case, it was Abercrombie's "no head wear" policy.The case involves the intersection of fashion, commerce and the freedom of religious expression under the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:21 pm
In a case Justice Antonin Scalia described as “really easy,” the Supreme Court held that an employer can be liable for failing to accommodate a religious practice even if the employer lacks actual knowledge of a need for an accommodation. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:12 pm
But the Court's latest pronouncement on Title VII religious accommodation in the EEOC v. [read post]
