Search for: "Flood Appeal" Results 21 - 40 of 2,714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by Robert Trautmann
This summer, a New York Court of Appeals decided the issue in Zurich’s favor, meaning that delays in construction caused by flood are subject to the flood sublimit of the policy. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:57 am by Brian Leiter
Berkeley Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 3:20 AM To: philosop@louisiana.edu Subject: Louisiana Floods Hi there, South Louisiana, where PHILOSOP is located,... [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 6:18 pm by Mark Hartsoe
The post Tennessee Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment, Saying Jury Should Decide if Woman’s Choice to Use Flooded Restroom Was Reasonable appeared first on Tennessee Injury Attorney Blog. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 11:35 am by Erik Slobe
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit [official website] on Friday affirmed [opinion, PDF] the dismissal of a case filed by the Board of Commissioners of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority [official website] against 97 defendants involved in the exploration and production of oil reserves, alleging their activities increased the risk of flooding in the region. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 1:35 pm by Steven Boutwell
Valuation appeals will have to be filed after shortly after the public inspection period. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 7:05 am by Charles Mathis
Last month, the Court of Appeal of the State of California, Fourth Appellate District held, “[a] flash flood is a type of ‘flood,’ as demonstrated by the fact that it is defined in terms of a flood. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 11:57 pm by Donald Dinnie
The court echoed the sentiments expressed by a South African court of appeal: “The position for him is no doubt hard; but those who enter into onerous or one-sided agreements have only themselves to thank. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:47 pm by Public BLAWG
August 29, 2011, by Matthew Lavrinets On August 24, 2011, the California Court of Appeal found in favor of San Bernardino County in an inverse condemnation case based upon flooding caused by water run-off from a County road. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
"Hurricane Katrina flood ruling upheld by federal appeals court": This article appears today in The Times-Picayune of New Orleans. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:43 pm
No one should be surprised that the United States Court of Appeals today reversed the decision of the Louisiana District Court on whether losses occasioned by rising water in New Orleans was the result of a "flood" and thus excluded from coverage under several different forms of "flood" exclusion. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:43 pm
No one should be surprised that the United States Court of Appeals today reversed the decision of the Louisiana District Court on whether losses occasioned by rising water in New Orleans was the result of a "flood" and thus excluded from coverage under several different forms of "flood" exclusion. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:22 pm
The Quebec Court of Appeal has dismissed a class action by owners of 1,723 homes that flooded in 1997, when sewers backed up in heavy rains. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today allowed the cross-appeal of the claimant, Gary Flood, against a decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat ([2009] EWHC 2375 (QB)) who had ruled, on the hearing of a preliminary issue, that the Times was entitled to rely on the defence of Reynolds qualified privilege in relation to the printed publication of an article. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
The owners lost before the Iowa District Court and before the Iowa Court of Appeals, but then were victorious before the Iowa Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:13 pm by Jennifer Gunsch
In its appeal, the State contended that plaintiffs’ complaint was untimely and that the State could not be liable because it owed no duty to provide any flood protection and because any protection it provided was reasonable. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 7:08 am
And The Times-Picayune of New Orleans reports today that "Flood damage verdict overruled; Appeal judges say exclusion is clear. [read post]