Search for: "Foote v. Taylor"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm
Taylor and Robert R. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:16 am
” In 2008 the court in Taylor v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:37 am
So this time the shoe's on the other foot. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:01 pm
Traffic Accident Results in Personal Injury Suit In Lampe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
Boone v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
Taylor v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
Officer Pacatte handed Brownwood Detective Joe Aaron Taylor a plastic sack that had the items in it. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 10:15 am
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:45 am
Danforth, Cody Delistraty, Cherie Harder, Markos Moulitsas, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:44 pm
Legal Principles In Hryniak v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
Samson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Co. v Beau Rivage Rest., supra at 102; see also McKie v Taylor, 146 AD2d 921 [1989]).'[Id.]. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Sánchez de Lozada and Mamani, et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
Officer Brown approached Ralph on foot and detained him. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm
Before proceeding any further, DeShay contacted Detective Taylor in the Treasure Islandpolice drug division and informed him of the situation, but Taylor declined to join them at the scene. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Foot Locker Retail, Inc., 168 Cal. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:12 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
