Search for: "Ford v. Stevens" Results 21 - 40 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 7:46 am by Steve Hall
The standard for competency at execution was set by Ford v Wainwright, a 1986 case in which the Supreme Court said that the Eighth Amendment’s bar against cruel and unusual punishment forbids execution of the “insane. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:49 am by Steve Hall
The question of competency to be executed was addressed in a 1989 Supreme Court case which set the standard for evaluating competency to be executed, Ford v. [read post]
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  In 1976, Stevens joined the plurality opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm by Jon Levitan
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Trump v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:38 pm
It's been settled at least since the Court decided Ford v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm by Erin Miller
The first is Stevens’ dissent in Scott v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by carie
"The institution is not going in the direction he thinks it should," he said.That was clear this year when he was on the losing side in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am by Erin Miller
  The procedure in that case, Burnham v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm by Erin Miller
Restraint: I cite Stevens’ opinions in just three unrelated cases over many years – Sprogis v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” At The New Republic, Matt Ford explains that although “Chief Justice John Roberts closed the door” this term on federal courts as a remedy for partisan gerrymandering, his opinion in Rucho v. [read post]