Search for: "Ford v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
” However, Ford was plainly wrong about the Founders’ understanding of “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” and about the precedent created by subsequent impeachment cases. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
We know these issues would be much different in the Hitchhiker universe, as after all Zaphod and Ford shared three of the same mothers. 9 - The Connecticut Law blog looks at cat bite law and whether a cat will get a free bite (or not.) [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
We know these issues would be much different in the Hitchhiker universe, as after all Zaphod and Ford shared three of the same mothers. 9 - The Connecticut Law blog looks at cat bite law and whether a cat will get a free bite (or not.) [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The Justice Department filed a complaint with the settlement agreement in U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]