Search for: "Forest v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm
Forest Service and its Chief. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:25 pm
The United States Forest Service (the Service) proposed the Smith Creek Project (the Project) in the Gallatin National Forest to reduce the risk of severe wildfire, to reduce the risk of insect infestation and disease, and to promote habitat diversity. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:15 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
Assistant Solicitor General Eric Miller appeared next on behalf of the United States as an amicus curiae supporting the respondent. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 11:54 pm
United States Department of Agriculture, (9th Cir., Aug. 27, 2007), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a decision by the U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society (collectively, HCPC or plaintiffs) brought suit against the United States Forest Service (Forest Service or Service), seeking a judgment declaring: (1) that the Forest Service has failed to retain the original map of the Wilderness in violation of the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460gg(b); (2) that the Forest Service’s description of… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society (collectively, HCPC or plaintiffs) brought suit against the United States Forest Service (Forest Service or Service), seeking a judgment declaring: (1) that the Forest Service has failed to retain the original map of the Wilderness in violation of the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, this case involves procedural challenges to a United States Forest Service Rule known as the "State Petitions Rule. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:58 am
Michael Kent Curtis (Wake Forest University - School of Law) has posted Citizens United and Davis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:18 am
Merits stage briefs: 17-269ts Petitioners Brief 17-269bsUnitedStates 17-269-bs-Tribal Respondents Amici in Support of Petitioners: Idaho and 10 Other States Brief Pacific Legal Foundation Brief Modoc Point Irrigation District Brief Business Organizations Brief Citizens Equal Rights Foundation Brief American Forest & Paper Association and National Mining Association Brief Washington State Association of Counties and Association of Washington Cities Amici Supporting… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
Professor Kaminski is a Research Scholar at Yale as well as the Executive Director of the Yale Information Society Project–we have been lucky to feature her insights on United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:04 am
<> Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:09 am
United States by Kristina M. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:42 am
This week, The Wake Forest Journal of Law & Policy published six articles from its 2012 Spring Symposium, on “Toxic Tort Litigation After Milward v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
United States District Court (In re United States), 791 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
Introduction In a case with several important echoes to Canadian appellate law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has revived the actor’s Hayden Christensen’s “idea theft” lawsuit against the USA Network this week in the Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 12:26 pm
The petitions of the week are: United States Forest Service v. [read post]
