Search for: "Francis v. Crafts" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2014, 8:55 am by Jay Yurkiw
Magistrate Judge Francis found that a “court-ordered middle ground” was “impractical” and “inappropriate” given the nature of the request and the complexities of crafting a search protocol. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am by Shamnad Basheer
Pranesh further criticized the decision of Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court in John Wiley v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:54 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: AC33291 - Local 84, Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, it Territories and Canada, AFL-CIO, CLC v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am by Guest
(What the hell was the rule we got from Pennoyer v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Sotheby’s, 11- 8604, and Sam Francis Foundation v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm by Nick Holmes
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:06 am by Larry Ribstein
Francis Pileggi gives his usual good analysis of Related Westpac LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
26 Jun 2005, 1:39 pm
Lawgivers have elevated "evidence" to an important place in our legal systems.[9] Indeed, "Evidence" itself is today even a required course of study for students in American law schools.[10] Lastly, in the modern scientific world, empirical "evidence" has ruled the roost for the physical sciences since the days of Leonardo da Vinci[11], Sir Francis Bacon[12] und Henri Poincaré.[13]But what about archaeology and related disciplines? [read post]