Search for: "G. (A) VS. B. (T)"
Results 21 - 40
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2022, 3:58 am
Restraint (immediate pay-off vs. patience to wait for future benefits) B. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:30 am
For stаte, federal аuditors, their mаin goаl is to аdd revenue аnd this might indicаte to meet their goаl, they’ll bring every trick out of the bаg. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:18 am
Don't get caught in the trap...protect your family. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:23 pm
, banka kredisi,senet,çek vs. borcu ile ilgili ödeme Taahhüdü bulunmakta ve ödeme gücü olmad??? [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:22 pm
vs. vs. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:01 pm
The question — should this be read as employees involved in (a) canning, (b) processing, (c) preserving, (d) freezing, (e) drying, (f) marketing, (g) storing, (h) packing for shipment, or (i) distribution of those products — a broad interpretation, favored by the employer — or (a) canning, (b) processing, (c) preserving, (d) freezing, (e) drying, (f) marketing, (g) storing, or (h) packing for shipment or distribution of those products — a… [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
This is what the science actually tells us at this time about grass-fed vs grain-fed beef safety. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:52 am
T 727/00, Reasons, point 1.1.4).1.6.3 The board notes, however, that most decisions following this well-established approach relate to amendments based on lists of non-con [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
According to the case law of the Enlarged Board, a point of law is of fundamental importance if the answer to it goes beyond the individual case at issue and will be relevant in a potentially large number of cases (G 1/12, Reasons, point 11).2.1 In the Board's view it appears self-evident that the point of law addressed in the question below is of fundamental importance for an indefinite number of cases. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:11 am
This so-called adapted problem/solution approach was developed in T 208/84 (Vicom) and T 641/00 (Comvik) and recently confirmed by the Enlarged Board of Appeal's opinion on case G 3/08. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 5:54 am
A raised ground of lack of inventive step may allow assessment of novelty in view of the closest prior art - G 7/91 and Guidelines (2017) D-III, 5. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
Pharmaceutical manufacturers are particularly vulnerable to securities fraud claims arising from the manufacturers’ pronouncements about safety or efficacy, the evidence for which is often statistical in nature. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:42 pm
Today's Dallas Court of Appeals case of the day is- Lowell Merritt vs. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:26 am
Regulatory arbitrage(a) General issue is costly vs. cheap electivity(b) Examples: check-the-box, anti-avoidance rules, debt vs. equity, rules constraining realization and recognition(c) Transaction cost tradeoff: more/cheaper vs. fewer/costlier transactions(d) Need to assess merits of the particular taxes that regulatory arbitrage permits one to avoid (e.g., for tax shelters, debt-equity under Miller, or domestic vs. international check-the-box)3. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Or maybe: how can you mix up guns and G-strings? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Or maybe: how can you mix up guns and G-strings? [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Brooks, B. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
The advantage resulting from the reduction of the number of the elements to be handled (EPE with separate PME according to D1 vs. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:17 am
B. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Se reporta (pfo 32) por ejemplo que el término trans "es un término sombrilla utilizado para describir las diferentes variantes de la identidad de género, cuyo común denominador es la no conformidad entre el sexo asignado al nacer de la persona y la identidad de género que ha sido tradicionalmente asignada a éste". [read post]
