Search for: "GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, petitioner." Results 21 - 40 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Accordingly, the Nassau Action which dealt with petitioner’s rights as an employee in no way decided the instant cause of action which involves petitioner’s rights as a one third owner of the corporation. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Jon Gelman
General Motors Corporation, 38 N.J.Super. 274, 118 A.2d 724 (Co.1955), aff'd 40 N.J.Super. 484, 123 A.2d 555 (App.Div.1956).A foundry worker who suffered silicosis in the course of his employment as a molder was permitted recovery based upon the theory that the silicosis aggravated the petitioner's dormant tuberculosis condition. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
General Motors Corporation Issue: Does the Americans with Disabilities Act permit an employer to reduce the retirement benefits of disabled workers because they receive federal disability benefits and do the ADA’s anti-discrimination protections apply to disabled former employees? [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari (No brief in opposition filed) __________________ Docket: 08-349 Title: General Motors Corporation, v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:39 am
Petitioners have disassociated from the national Episcopal Church. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 2:24 pm
Petitioners have disassociated from the national Episcopal Church. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division pointed out that "To exclude a substantive issue from arbitration, therefore, generally requires specific enumeration in the arbitration clause itself of the subjects intended to be put beyond the arbitrator's reach. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division pointed out that "To exclude a substantive issue from arbitration, therefore, generally requires specific enumeration in the arbitration clause itself of the subjects intended to be put beyond the arbitrator's reach. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:50 am by Russell Knight
 Petitioner’s answers to the Second Supplemental Notice to Produce Documents sent to Petitioner on May 30, 2019;Petitioner’s answers to the Second 201(k) letter sent to Petitioner on August 13, 2019; andPetitioner’s answers to the Motion to Compel sent to Petitioner on August 23, 2019. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:39 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Northshore University Healthsystem, and earlier in American Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]