Search for: "General Public Utilities Corp. v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2009, 2:30 pm
Enablement is closely related to the requirement for utility.6 As we noted in Process Control Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:25 am
Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae …. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Petitioners asserted eight causes of action, generally taking issue with the procedure utilized by the APA in approving the permits and the failure to conduct an adjudicatory hearing. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Petitioners asserted eight causes of action, generally taking issue with the procedure utilized by the APA in approving the permits and the failure to conduct an adjudicatory hearing. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
While the standards for expert witness testimony may differ between state and federal courts, all federal courts are bound by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Daubert v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Medrad, on the other hand, argues that this Court does not have the authority to dismiss its invalidity and unenforceability counterclaims as moot because, according to Medrad, the United States Supreme Court has held that a finding of non-infringement does not moot an invalidity counterclaim. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:00 am
United Statesor Camp v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Lee Holding Co., 471 F.3d 6, 11 (1st Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm
The case concerns the right of states and private parties to sue electric utilities under public nuisance theory for contributing to global warming. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
For these reasons, we hold that confirmation of the ICC’s award is not contrary to the public policy of the United States under Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 8:03 am
The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision in City of Arlington, Texas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. 1, ET AL.The motion of Golden State Water Company for disqualificationof counsel in No. 06-1457 is denied. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
