Search for: "German v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2012, 4:04 am
US discovery is a bone of contention between Germany and the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:58 pm
The latest volume of the German Yearbook of International Law (Vol. 64, 2021) is out. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
The patient’s data may be used by the developer of the health app only: for the intended use of the health app and for the reimbursement procedure; to prove the benefit of the application (in the framework of specific procedures regulated under Book V of the Social Security Code); to comply with legal obligations imposed by the EU Medical Devices Regulation 2017/745 and the German Medical Devices Implementation Act, and to ensure, on an ongoing basis, the technical… [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:21 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:16 am
Similar to Abbott v Dexcom, the key reason for the present application was to avoid the German injunction gap (an issue explained in detail in Abbott v Dexcom, [33]). [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:50 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California).That's why I just can't help but share a soundbite from today's Nokia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day rejoices in the name Johannes Baumgartner Wirtschafts-und-Vermögensberatung GmbH v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:57 am
Directive 98/34 requires in fact Member States to notify the European Commission of any “technical regulations” that they intend to adopt. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
The reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK was equally applicable here. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
The judges state that the library user may rely on Sec. 53 UrhG when using the library terminal. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:23 am
In the case of C‑582/14 Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has delivered another landmark judgment concerning the proper characterisation of IP addresses and the compatibility of German national law with Article 7(f) of the Data Protection Directive (DPD). [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:57 am
The case is Facebook Inc. and Facebook Ireland Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:58 am
For these purposes, the right holder should take all reasonable steps, including commissioning of the investigation by a specialized firm or instituting an investigation before the state authorities. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
As in Scheck v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm
+ come(v.). [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 10:08 am
Unlike the President of the United States, the German head of state has a purely ministerial function unless a bill raises constitutional issues, which this one obviously doesn't. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:36 am
In the case of the day Po-Hi Tang v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:36 am
In the case of the day Po-Hi Tang v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:25 am
A Yes.This is the Düsseldorf Regional Court's order to stay a Huawei v. [read post]
