Search for: "Grant v. Commonwealth"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:45 am
CFPB et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
In addition, opportunities for civil society or victim groups to intervene during criminal proceedings to advocate for compensation are limited, as highlighted in Nigeria v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm
Against this backdrop, we should be granting Pennsylvania's petition for en banc review, supported by 17 other states and the District of Columbia as amici, or at least holding it c.a.v. pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:34 am
This was somewhat changed by a 2020 decision by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in the case of Neves v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Howarth v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am
Instead, it asked the parties to brief whether it could grant relief without holding the evidentiary hearing that the Third Circuit had ordered. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
The central issue was whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted to restrain the respondent from making allegedly defamatory statements on a matter of public interest. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:43 am
The court distinguished the holding in Commonwealth Ins. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm
Bradley, Sands asks the justices to grant review and reverse the 9th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm
Enter B.C. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
The $141 million settlement was reached after the Court granted the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Hochul (E.D.N.Y. 2022) (relying on "the unique sensitivities that exist within the current political climate and social context" in granting anonymity); Does 1 through 11 v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:05 pm
In Hyland v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Thus, in Lawson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
A recent decision by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania casts doubt on this type of response. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Supreme Court in the case of Mallory v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
