Search for: "Grant v. Pfizer Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2019, 6:22 am
Legal background regarding Arrow-declarations The underlying jurisdiction was established in Arrow Generics v Merck & Co Inc [2007] FSR 39 and approved by the Court of Appeal in Fujifilm v AbbVie [2017] EWCA Civ. 1. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:22 am
Dotson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Another "grant and hold" case, Pfizer v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:25 am
In Pfizer Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
I note that we still have not yet seen an opinion in the other Tobacco II "grant and hold" case, Pfizer v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
See Pfizer Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:28 am
Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 10:02 am
A European patent for the drug was granted to Warner-Lambert Co, LLC ("Warner-Lambert")(now a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.) under EP number 0 641 330. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
(dated 08/17/07) All of the letters argue that, at a minimum, the Supreme Court should issue a "grant and hold" order pending resolution of In re Tobacco Cases II and Pfizer. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 11:02 pm
The case is Daniel v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The Federal Court recently held, in Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
In Weinstat v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:48 am
Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:48 am
Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 48. [12] See Free World Trust, supra, at paragraph 13; Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation Ltd, 2002 SCC 77 at paragraph 37, [2002] 4 SCR 153; AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2017 SCC 36 at paragraph 39, [2017] 1 SCR 943 [13] See Free World Trust, supra, at paragraphs 33–43; applied in Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
(Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:54 am
The opinion turns on the trial court’s subsequent decertification of both the UCL and breach of warranty claims based on issues relating to absent class member reliance set forth in the Second District’s decision in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:01 am
In the Pfizer case — Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
The application (Pfizer v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
In Pfizer v. [read post]
