Search for: "Grant v. Walgreen Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
However, Katz v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
City, 1 NY3d 280, 290; Calderon v Walgreen Co., 72 AD3d 1532, appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 900). [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
Walgreens Corp. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:19 am
” Old Charter Distillery Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:56 pm
Walgreen Co. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 1:30 am
The settlement, in Geis v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 11:00 am
Walgreen Co., 721 F.3d 492, 494 (8th Cir. 2013) (same). [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:52 pm
Walgreen Co., March 23, 2018, U.S. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:52 pm
Walgreen Co., March 23, 2018, U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Walgreen Co., 18-349, involving employers’ need to make accommodations to their employees’ religious observance; Alito, joined by Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch, filed an opinion concurring in the denial. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Walgreen Co., 927 A.2d 1001, 1003-04 (Conn. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:24 am
See General Telephone Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Walgreen. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
Walgreen Co., 88 F.3d 1025, 1033 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 6:28 pm
Neither the conceal and carry law, nor the state’s Self-Defense Act, nor any other law cited by the pharmacist provided the basis for a public policy exception to his at-will employment (Hoven v Walgreen Co, June 2, 2014, Moore, K). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Walgreen Co., 18-349. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 12:08 pm
” Old Charter Distillery Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:17 am
Based on the Task Force letter, appellants moved the district court and were granted leave to file a second amended complaint to add the following defendants to the action: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Longs Drug Stores Co.; Walgreen Co.; CVS Pharmacy, Inc.; Rite-Aid; Albertson's Inc., d/b/a Sav-on Pharmacy; and Lam's Pharmacy, Inc. [read post]
