Search for: "Gray v. No Named Respondents" Results 21 - 40 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2020, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Similar claims for damages to those made by the appellant were held to be irrecoverable by the House of Lords in Gray v Thames Trains Ltd [2009] UKHL 33 (“Gray”). [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm by SCOTUStalk
Deanne Maynard, co-chair of Morrison & Foerster’s Appellate and Supreme Court practice, has argued 14 cases before the Supreme Court since her first oral argument in 2004. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:14 am by James Williams
 Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans, which are generally covered under trademark law.Works that are not fixed in a tangible form of expression, such as a speech or performance that is not recorded or written down. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 2:28 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
They acquired property in various jurisdictions using the appellant’s money, but held it in either the respondent’s name or in corporate names. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Taxotere is the brand name for docetaxel, a chemotherapic medication used either alone or in conjunction with another chemotherapy, to treat a number of different cancers. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm by Jackie McDermott
Responding to the president’s initial claims of “total authority,” Yoo was unequivocal. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
Gray (Brian Gray Law, Toronto) dealt with “Canada’s Certificates of Supplementary Protection (“CSP”): One Year Later”. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 3:24 am
Thomas, III and Carolyn Thomas Walters v. [read post]