Search for: "Greene v. State of California (1990)" Results 21 - 40 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
         GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
Among the cases he worked on in the 1953 term was Barsky v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
Atwood (California Court of Appeals 2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 805, 2 Cal.Rptr.3d 67; Tusher v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
As of May 31, 2022, a total of 18 outbreak-associated cases of hepatitis A have been reported from 3 statesCalifornia (16), Minnesota (1), and North Dakota (1). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
CalECPA was introduced by California State Senators Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) and Joel Anderson (R-Alpine), who both fought for years to get stronger digital privacy protections for Californians. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Here in California, the question may be more difficult in light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Silver Hills Country Club v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
So medical monitoring in California doesn't appear to be a completely independent cause of action. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While it is true that “an attorney should not be held liable for ignorance of facts which the client neglected to tell him or her,” an attorney also “has a responsibility to investigate and prepare every phase of a client’s case” (Green v Conciatori, 26 AD3d 410, 411 “ [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. et al, case number 2:18-cv-01435 was filed in the United States District Court Central District of California against Guillermo del Toro (the director, producer, and writer), Daniel Kraus (associate producer), Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]