Search for: "HALL v. POWELL" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Only one Justice, Lewis Powell, believed that the rule should differ; but since he was the swing vote, his position became the law. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:41 am by Dan Ernst
Cardozo ; an unappealing model of a hairy hand inspired by Hawkins v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:39 pm by Harold O'Grady
Justice Powell told his biographer that the death penalty should be abolished. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 A.C.18; [2011] H.L.R.23, it was held that the decision in Pinnock was of general application whenever a public authority sought possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
LeeAnn Hall & Danny HoSang Beyond Public/Private: Understanding Corporate Power john a. powell & Stephen Menendian The Help Association of Black Women Historians Reshaping the Social Contract: Demographic Distance and Our Fiscal Future Manuel Pastor & Vanessa Carter Social Justice Movements in a Liminal Age Deepak Bhargava II. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The decision of Tugendhat J in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 14 (QB)) was widely discussed in the media. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  There were Powell v Birmingham Mail (Clause 1), Landers v Darlington and Stockton Times (Clause 1), Dobson v Sun (Clause 1), Fellows v Sunday Mercury (Clauses 1 and 5), Choudry v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Buchan v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Rape Crisis v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Brown v Lincolnshire Echo (Clauses 3 and 5), Cousins v Times (Clause 1). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
  Howell asserts that the Hog and Hominy State’s approach to identifying mental retardation violates Atkins, suggesting in his reply that the case be held for Hall v. [read post]