Search for: "HANFORD V US" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Mashkevich Gossip Site That Uses Misidentified Photo May Be Liable for Publicity Rights Violation — Edme v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 6:19 am by Eric Goldman
Hanford Sentinel case, we need to own all of our words all of the time. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Below, I have updated the case law on the issue of using relative and attributable risks to satisfy plaintiff’s burden of showing, more likely than not, that an exposure or condition caused a plaintiff’s disease or injury. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:18 pm
City of Hanford (2007) 41 Cal.4th 279On June 7, 2007, the California Supreme Court addressed head-on the issue of whether or not cities may use their planning and zoning powers to directly impact economic competition. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Defense Department, 08-125).. ** Whether the operators of a plutonium-production plant in Hanford, Wash., making materials for use in atomic bombs as part of the “Manhattan Project,” are entitled to legal defenses against damage lawsuits by individuals claiming they were harmed by radioactive releases from the facility. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:19 pm by Amy Howe
Washington, the federal government’s challenge to a special Washington state worker’s compensation law for over 100,000 federal contract workers employed at the Hanford site in the state, which produced much of the weapons-grade plutonium used in the early days of the country’s nuclear program but which also generated large amounts of radioactive waste. [read post]