Search for: "HARPER v. HARPER" Results 21 - 40 of 1,646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm by Derek Muller
Harper… Continue reading The post Some thoughts on state power to conduct presidential primaries (and why the Moore v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Personal Information is Property, Jim Harper, American Enterprise Institute The Nominalism of the New Nominate Torts, Supreme Court Law Review, 2nd Series, 2024, Kerry Sun and Stéphane Sérafin,  Univer [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Research conducted by the communications company Fenimore Harper found that over 100 deepfake adverts depicting Rishi Sunak were promoted to an estimated 400,000 social media users in the last month, the Guardian reports. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm by Matt Miller, Registered Patent Attorney
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
Sandra Day O’Connor’s Copyright Legacy — The Copyright Alliance’s Rachel Kim takes a look at three major copyright decisions penned by Justice O’Connor, who passed away December 1: Harper & Row Publishers v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hawthorn Children's Psychiatric Hospital Government and  Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law, Personal Injury Supreme Court of Missouri   Harper v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hawthorn Children's Psychiatric Hospital Government and  Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law, Personal Injury Supreme Court of Missouri   Harper v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]