Search for: "HARTFORD v GENERAL MOTORS" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The first part of the article reviewed the important cases and trends in the general civil litigation context. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  We took a look, but first we had to eliminate those states that, for one reason or another, generally preclude punitive damages, allowing drug and device manufacturers to enjoy The Day of the Dove in common-law cases. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Co. of Hartford, 2008 WL 6653070 (2008). [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
While CVS Health’s acquisition of Aetna kept the company–which had planned a relocation to New York City–in Hartford,[6] there was no such reprieve with General Electric or Alexion Pharmaceuticals, both of which decamped to Boston.[7] Corporations headquartered elsewhere, like Caterpillar, Motorola, and Kraft Heinz, reduced the size of their Connecticut workforces—and that’s just the companies that shifted jobs to one city, Chicago.[8] The biggest… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Stanton Wettick.The common and overriding rationale of the consolidation decisions is that the claims arising out of the same "transaction or occurrence," i.e the same motor vehicle accident, should be tried together as a means of furthering the interests of judicial economy for the already overburdened trial courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADASee issue description at Public CitizenØ SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
See Ead Motors Eastern Air Devices, 346 NLRB No. 93, slip op. at 4-5 (2006). [read post]