Search for: "HEARD v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Jonathan H. Adler] Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Blue State Challenge to Cap on SALT Deduction
18 Apr 2022, 8:21 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the legal theories asserted by New York, et al. could not attract a single vote. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:12 pm
Daktronics, Inc., et al., No. 21-438 (CVSG requested October 4, 2021); and Appellate Standing for IPR Challenger: Apple Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
See Towers v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:45 pm
City of Los Angeles, et al (China Shipping (North America) Holding Co., Ltd., et al, Real Parties in Interest) (2021) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Generally, a lawyer agrees to pursue the goals of a client to the extent the law permits, even when the lawyer believes that the client’s desires are unwise. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm
The ’34 Act’s general anti-fraud claims have a five-year statute of repose measured from the date of each material misstatement or omission. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
BP America Production Company, et al., No. 20-30224 (5th Cir. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
BP America Production Company, et al., No. 20-30224 (5th Cir. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
In Dominguez v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am
Thomas Grisso et al., Juveniles’ Competence to Stand Trial: A Comparison of Adolescents’ and Adults’ Capacities as Trial Defendants, 27 L. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
The U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Donald Glaser et al., 937 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019), on remand, 2020 U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm
Supreme Court case of Dukes et al v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Khalid Shaikh Mohammad et al. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Berkheimer, No. 18-415 (fact-law divide in eligibility) (waiting for views of Solicitor General) Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al. v. [read post]
