Search for: "HEIGHTS ELEVATOR CORP."
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm
Fund Corp., 18 NY3d 1, 4). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:24 am
Corp., 289 AD2d 322; Bedassee v 3500 Snyder Ave. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:53 am
The Souris River, currently at an elevation of 1,555 feet above sea level, is expected to rise eight feet higher, to 1,563 feet, by this weekend. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
(EDTexweblog.com) Otis – Repeated failure to comply with discovery obligations warrants terminating and evidentiary sanctions: Shindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:56 pm
All Safe Heights Contracting Corp. [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 226-27 (2001). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
– EPA News Release, July 14, 2010 Twenty-six parties have agreed to help clean up the Great Lakes Container Corp. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:55 am
Corp., 11 NY3d 757, 758, 896 N.E.2d 75, 866 N.Y.S.2d 592 wherein The Court held; "As our holding in Outar v City of New York indicates, "falling object" liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) is not limited to cases in which the falling object is in the process of being hoisted or secured... [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Army Corps of Engineers violated federal environmental laws by failing to give the public enough of a say before issuing permits for mountaintop removal coal mines in West Virginia, a federal judge ruled Tuesday. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:47 pm
The equitable approach is flexible but not boundlessly so, in contrast to currently proposed reforms that elevate discretion to new heights. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
Two existing elevators will be replaced and a third will be added to serve the west side parking area. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
Federal Express Corp., 4 N.Y.3d 805 (2005)(Plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his own injuries where he chose to use an upside-down bucket rather than an available ladder). [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
He also testified that the I-beams were elevated approximately three feet above his head when they came loose and fell. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:56 am
Owners Corp., 87 NY2d 938 [1996], the Court of Appeals held that routine household window washing did not fall within the ambit of Labor Law § 240(1). [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 5:46 am
Meridian Rail Corp., 479 F.3d 527, 528 (7th Cir. 2007). [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 6:20 pm
In holding that sec. 240(1) applied, the Court reasoned that the plaintiff was working at a elevated height because there was a 12-foot distance between where he was required to work and the floor below. [read post]
