Search for: "HENDERSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am by Mark A. Graber
Andrew Rogers of New Jersey included the presidency when he stated, “Without the States an officer of the Government cannot be elected. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
LEXIS 95070 (D NJ, Oct. 13, 2009), a New Jersey federal magistrate judge found that there were factual disputes that precluded summaryjudgement for either side ina suit by a Catholic prisoner who complained that he was disciplined for refusing to work at his prison job on Sundays, while accommodations were made for Jews, Muslims and Seventh Day Adventists to avoid work on their Sabbaths.In Henderson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
Category: FYI;Legal Research Body: The Office of Legislative Research has issued the following reports: Summary of New Jersey Case on Eyewitness Identification- 2011-R-0334 You asked for a summary of the New Jersey Supreme Court's ruling on eyewitness identification in State v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
Cadman, The Corporation in New Jersey; Business and Politics, 1791-1875 (1949). 9. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
Earls, 214 N.J. 564, 70 A.3d 630 (New Jersey Supreme Court 2013).State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
The New Jersey Experience Until recently, New Jersey law looked as though it favored vigorous gatekeeping of invalid expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
The other states (Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, North Dakota, and Utah) use fraud on the FDA as an exception to compliance-based bars on punitive damages. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am by Phil Cave
Henderson, a New Jersey Supreme Court case, decided 24 August 2011. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am by davidharrisauthor
 In those decades, she says, “advances in scientific study have strongly suggested that eyewitnesses are apt to erroneously identify a person…when certain factors are present, ” and she cites the 2011 opinion of the New Jersey Supreme Court in New Jersey v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am by davidharrisauthor
 In those decades, she says, “advances in scientific study have strongly suggested that eyewitnesses are apt to erroneously identify a person…when certain factors are present, ” and she cites the 2011 opinion of the New Jersey Supreme Court in New Jersey v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  There were a number of other factors overlaying the court’s conclusion; the jury initially was deadlocked 8-4 for acquittal, and the concurring opinion notes the New Jersey Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. [read post]