Search for: "Hall v. Twitter Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
; Slaight Communications Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On 30 December 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of S (A Child) v TikTok Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Squad will help Twitter “bring new ways for people to interact, express themselves, and join in the public conversation,” Twitter’s VP of product, Ilya Brown, said in a tweet. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Twitter Inc, Reddit and a group representing major internet firms  have filed an amicus brief in support of a lawsuit challenging a Trump Administration’s 2019 rules requiring nearly all U.S. visitors and visa applicants to disclose social media user information from the prior five years. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Triplark v Northwood Hall & Ors [2019] EWHC 3494 (QB),  (heard 5 December 2019). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
The Canadian Bar Association “IP Day” – May 30, 2019At the Canadian Bar Association’s perennial “IP day” on May 30, 2019, there was a first ever “town hall” session on the Copyright Board (the “Board”). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
(Photo credi: LOIC VENANCE/AFP/Getty Images) Some of the best conversations about tax and tax reform in 2017 weren’t found in conference rooms or the halls of Congress: They were on Twitter. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:07 am by Scott Bomboy
The only rule is that Twitter Inc. gets to decide who speaks and listens -- which is its right under the First Amendment. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
And fortunately, for the rule of law, what happens on Twitter stays on Twitter. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
John Darwin’s privacy complaint against the Daily Mail has been resolved, as has Linda Hall’s against the Courier. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Part 1 – Adrienne Page QC Case Law: OPO v James Rhodes (formerly MLA): Pianist’s book unbanned, no intention to cause distress – Dan Tench Case Law: Mosley v Google Inc, Data Protection claim against Google to go to trial – Lorna Skinner Privacy Issues in New Zealand: Sex with the Office Lights on – Nicole Moreham Case Law: Vidal-Hall v Google, Distress damages can be awarded under s 13 DPA without pecuniary loss (and misuse… [read post]