Search for: "Handle v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 13,651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:02 pm
For example, in Italian Colors Rest. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
Tenth Circuit: And even if police might have handled it differently, they're going to get qualified immunity for shooting you. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
That was the argument before the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Malicki v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:00 am
This approach is preferred because, as illustrated in the case of POC v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:47 am
Pa.) in Monge v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:59 am
When asked to describe the impact, the employee stated, “[v]ery light, not harsh at all,” and said he hit the plaintiff with his shoulder. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:40 am
He ably handled tough questions from the Justices, persuasively rebutted claims by the State, and centered his client throughout. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:37 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:14 am
Ball State University, where a student sued alleging a professor’s advances created a hostile learning environment, and Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:52 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
