Search for: "Hardy v. Doe et al"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
(trochar) Deposition2000-01-16 Doe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
(trochar) Deposition2000-01-16 Doe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
§ 1011 et seq., with regard to plaintiffs bringing tort claims for exposure to radioactivity. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Dotson et al, Brand Attitudes and Search Engine Queries, 37 J. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
Unlike these other statutes, § 2259 does not explicitly require a “direct” or “proximate” harm to the individual for that individual to qualify for restitution; rather, according to the statute’s plain language, any harm resulting from a qualifying offense is sufficient. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
She writes that: The amicus brief by Kopel et al. paints a picture of widespread gun carrying incongruous with this well-established history. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
Biogen et al (CAFC 2006-1634, -1649) precedential; Judges Rader (chiming in), Newman (author), Moore (dissent) The three patents contain a total of 230 claims. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Landow Aviation LP, et al. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
