Search for: "Harper v. Kennedy"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:15 pm
The application was dismissed. 764139 Ontario Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:59 am
Consider Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Sykes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:02 pm
Harper Thursday, June 15—Haaland v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:36 pm
Harper and Mendrygal sent us their acceptance speech via email. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
Bruen (Gun rights) Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
Harper. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
Fields, Martinez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Harper as evidence that the Court is not "partisan. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Harper, et al., The Law of Torts §§ 25.1, at 493 (2d ed. 1986)] (‘Harper’). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Joseph Kennedy, the first Chairman of the SEC, had a saying: “No honest business need fear the SEC. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 9:22 am
The Split on the Court and the Legacy of Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
Justice Kennedy was even more cautious in a concurring opinion that he wrote. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
Lastly, at Casetext, Shaakirrah Sanders assesses the larger role Justice Anthony Kennedy may now play in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:26 pm
Bruen (involving gun rights) and Kennedy v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
See Leser v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am
” At Concurring Opinions, Youngjae Lee highlights a passage of limiting language in Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:00 pm
Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird (2006) (Harper Perennial Modern Classics). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
These three cases, taken together, are nothing less than a revolution in free exercise clause jurisprudence, tying the hands of the states when it comes to regulating private schools-- all done with no originalist support.In Kennedy v. [read post]
