Search for: "Health Care Services, Inc. v. National Prescription Administrators, Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
But Connecticut has historically prioritized relatively high provision of government services. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 1:31 pm
Although the guidance primarily focused on the use of copay coupons under Medicare Part D, the agency specifically noted that the prohibition applies to all federal health care programs. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm
In the case of insured health plans, sponsors, insurers and administrators also will need to consider whether their ability to take advantage of the federal relieve available is blocked or restricted by state insurance statutes, regulations or other administrative requirements. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
The district court had held that “Union Pacific violated Title VII, as amended by the PDA, because ‘it treats medical care women need to prevent pregnancy less favorably than it treats medical care needed t [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
See Public Health Service (PHS) Act §2707(b). [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:10 pm
Circuit Attorney KBR Privilege Case (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)US Sues KBR for Kickbacks and False Claims Relating to Iraq Support Services Contract (burnpitclaims.blogspot.com)Public Disclosures Don't Bar Halliburton FCA Suit, Court Says (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Medical Device Litigation: Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. ___, 131 S. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
Verify Character and Implications of Proposed Features and Products Alone & In Conjunction With Overall Benefit Design To Avoid Unexpected Exposures As employer and other plan sponsors, insurers, and their service providers continue to struggle to understand and select the health plan options legally allowed when the next wave of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (ACA) health care reforms take effect on January 1, 2014, recent guidance… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Ass’n of the U.S., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Ass’n of the U.S., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
A few progressive companies looked at the health care model to better control medical costs and began to adapt the concept of networks to Workers’ Compensation. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm
Concerned about how the mandates and costs of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act will impact your corporate and family finances following the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
The June 28, 2012 Supreme Court National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
If Congress did not speak unambiguously, then step two asks whether the federal administrative agency’s statutory interpretation enacted in a regulation is reasonable. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
If Congress did not speak unambiguously, then step two asks whether the federal administrative agency’s statutory interpretation enacted in a regulation is reasonable. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
Neither the Affordable Care Act nor any other law attaches negative legal consequences to not buying health insurance, beyond requiring a payment to the IRS. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
In addition, Escalona and others paid kickbacks to patient recruiters and to doctors who signed fraudulent prescriptions and plans of care (POCs) for unnecessary home health services for patients at Willsand. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Our health care insurance system is heavily dependent upon trust. [read post]
