Search for: "Hill v. American Medical Response" Results 21 - 40 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
To be sure, judges have often poorly expressed their reasoning for deciding scientific evidentiary issues, and perhaps poor communication or laziness by judges was responsible for Rothman’s interest in joining the Daubert fray. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
Ahmed-Saucedo’s dismissal of the importance of a dose-response relationship, another Hill factor, as unimportant sealed her fate. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at the solicitor general’s response to the Supreme Court’s request that the government weigh in on the cert petition in Sokolow v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Gans, The American Law of Torts at § 3.12 & note 88 (1983 & Supp. 1984) (collecting cases on joint flooding and polluting). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
”  The Associated Press (via the Boston Globe) and The Hill provide coverage. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
”  The Associated Press (via the Boston Globe) and The Hill provide coverage. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” Max Greenwood reports on Stevens’ proposal at The Hill. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Capitol Hill House Democrats’ “Leading Infrastructure for Tomorrow’s America Act” (LIFT America Act) –containing $40 billion dedicated for broadband, largely through reverse auctions – remains pending. [read post]