Search for: "Holstein v. Holstein"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm
See Envirogas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm
The decision in Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH (C-210/16) is likely to have significant implications for Facebook and for those who are using social media sites for certain purposes that go beyond merely personal ones. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:13 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:26 am
Knopfler (In re Holstein), 321 B.R. 229 (Bankr. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 24 October 2017, the Advocate General’s Opinion in the case of Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
W & J Holsteins, Inc., 64 NY2d 977; Crowley v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:18 am
Along the way he purchased a large Mason County farm where he raised blue-ribbon Holsteins. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:35 am
Soutner v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 5:43 pm
The case is LDT Keller Farms LLC et al v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Judgement was handed down by Nicklin J in Riley v Murray [2021] EWHC 3437 (QB) on 20 December 2021. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Kelley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Kelley v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:46 pm
Facebook was in the news again recently, because Commissioner Thilo Weichert, of the Independent Centre for Privacy Protection in the northern German state of Schleswig-Holstein apparently banned Facebook’s Like button, as reported by Emil Protalinski on ZDNet last month. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:53 am
Here’s the court’s decision: Gienapp v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:21 am
The AG issued his opinion on the status of dynamic IP addresses in connection with the case Patrick Breyer v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
As reported by the Inquirer, a state appeals court “upheld the proposition that German privacy laws don’t apply to Facebook, and ruled that the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein has to accept that“. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not 9. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:30 am
About eight years ago I published a document called The Rights and Responsibilities of Self-Represented Litigants that took rights-based approach to the role of litigants within the justice system and the expectations they should have as to how they will be treated. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:01 am
Mentioned is also the English case O v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
A few years ago I was doing some work for a professional association on guidelines for dealing with litigants without counsel and I was struck by the extent to which some legal professionals regard litigants without counsel as interlopers who gum up the finely tuned, well-oiled machine that is their justice system. [read post]
