Search for: "Hopkins v. Strong"
Results 21 - 40
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2020, 3:43 am
Since his appointment he has given judgment in a wide range of important defamation, privacy and data protection cases including, for example: Yeo v Times Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWHC 3375 (QB) Lachaux v Independent Print [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) Economou v de Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB) Hourani v Thomson [2017] EWHC 432 (QB) NT1 and NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) Lloyd… [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Julie Gerberding, the co-chair of the commission on strengthening America’s health security at CSIS; Thomas Inglesby, director of the Center for Health Security at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; and Tara O'Toole, the executive vice president of In-Q-Tel, a non-profit venture capital firm. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
Hopkins (1989) is a form of gender discrimination. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 6:27 pm
” That of course returns us to the world of Hopkins v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
The trial court, in Ruff v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
” Although few now remember Matthews’s bitter confirmation battle, he is perhaps best remembered today for his 1886 opinion in the case of Yick Wo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Mark Crain and Nicole V. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
Disclaimer: I act for both claimants and defendants, including in two of the cases cited above – Monroe v Hopkins & Singh v Weayou. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm
V. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:18 pm
” Oneale v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Hopkins (1989), the Supreme Court ruled that reliance on sex-role stereotyping can be an actionable form of employment discrimination. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am
Tarry’s third example is a study conducted under the leadership of the late Joseph Gitlin, at Johns Hopkins Medical School. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm
Hopkins. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
The language was strong, the complaint being that “hardly a day passes without another drip drip drip of mendacious vitriol and bile from Guardian writers attacking us and our readers”. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Finally, in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
