Search for: "House v. Hastings"
Results 21 - 40
of 282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA and Biden v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
In Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), an opinion that was written with great haste and insufficient briefing. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in Forsyth County v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (“SLSC”) has identified a re-attempt by the Government to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to lower the threshold for police intervention in respect of protests that was already rejected in January 2023 in the Public Order Bill—now the Public Order Act 2023. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:54 pm
Department of the Treasury [ix] FACT SHEET: President Biden Signs Executive Order to Ensure Robust Reviews of Evolving National Security Risks by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States | The White House [x] New Rules for CFIUS: How Investment Funds Can React and Take Advantage | Paul Hastings LLP [xi] The 20 most active LPs in direct PE investments | PitchBook [xii] Id. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
As one House Committee Report stated, exempt offerings should be “a specific or an isolated sale of…securities to a particular person”[10] and were intended for limited transactions “where the public benefits are too remote. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
The political target of the Bill amendment, which the government says it will introduce in the House of Lords, is videos of migrants crossing the Channel in boats. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
DOMA passed both houses of Congress by a wide margin—342-67 in the House and 85-14 in the Senate. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
He said that the Government would introduce an early dismissal procedure and a new costs protection regime but warned against legislating in haste. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:05 pm
(See Zuckerman v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
I’ve written this in preparation for the Supreme Court appeal in NetChoice v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
A lawyer’s clients or customers may include individuals, businesses, government agencies, judges, in-house counsel, and (quite often) other lawyers, such as partners, within a practice group. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 7:39 am
Mr Hastings appealed to the Inner House of the Court of Session. [read post]
