Search for: "IN RE ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS"
Results 21 - 40
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
Icon Health & Fitness, No. 12-1184, a patent case. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
Icon Health & Fitness, No. 12-1184, a patent case. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
Icon Health & Fitness, No. 12-1184, a patent case. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:49 am
In re Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:15 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. broadened the “exceptional case” rubric used to determine when an award of attorney fees is appropriate in a district court patent dispute. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 11:36 am
Icon Health and Fitness, the court made it easier for defendants that win patent cases to get their attorney’s fees paid by the patent holder. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:49 am
Here, court found the reference reasonably pertinent, and as a result affirmed the finding of obviousness.More detail of In re Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. after the jump. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., the Supreme Court also rejected the “rigid” two-part Brooks Furniture test, holding that “an ‘exceptional’ case [warranting attorney fees] is simply one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position . . . or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:55 pm
Also sued Icon Health & Fitness in South Florida, alleging infringement of a non-Harris patent. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:22 am
Icon Health and Fitness considered the standard for identifying patent cases sufficiently “exceptional” to warrant fee awards. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., which dealt with a similar two-part test created by the Federal Circuit in Brooks Furniture dealing with reasonable attorney fees. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:58 pm
See, e.g., Icon Health & Fitness,Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court’s anticipated June 2014 decision in Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 6:21 am
And they’re dangerous times..... [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 3:15 pm
Cir. 2000))); Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:44 am
The timing of the mental health trend fits the smartphone’s increasing substitution for in-person socialization, while the Great Awokening and Trumpism are more chronologically downstream. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:52 am
Cir. 2010) (quoting In re ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374,1379 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:00 am
In November, I wrote about how Gatorade’s 2009 re-branding as G has been a complete failure. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
