Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL FROM THE DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT, ETC. "
Results 21 - 40
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2019, 2:09 am
The claimants were keen that the matter be tried in England against both defendants. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Veterans, Patriots, Memorial, etc. day … Kill them. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:21 am
That changed in 1986 with the statute’s amendment, as the Court of Appeals explained in Matter of Penepent Corp.: As originally enacted, section 1118 permitted electing shareholders to revoke their elections at any time. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm
Lofgren, as Trustee, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2018) ___ Cal.App.5th ____. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
On Appeal from the 215th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2017-13499. [read post]
12 May 2018, 4:40 am
If that motion is unsuccessful, that party can then appeal the denial of that motion. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Google Inc.,[10] the court granted Google leave to appeal the decision but refused Google’s application to stay enforcement of the injunction order. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
As a practical matter, of course, the industry could simply take the position that whatever the interest rate was at that time of [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
It permits public agencies to conduct an abbreviated environmental review of general plan amendments and other land use initiatives in a manner that does not interfere with the prompt placement of such initiatives on the ballot. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
It permits public agencies to conduct an abbreviated environmental review of general plan amendments and other land use initiatives in a manner that does not interfere with the prompt placement of such initiatives on the ballot. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
By operation of the Fourteenth Amendment, it is applicable to the States. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
As I have previously noted and questioned, Canada chose not to have this challenge dismissed initially on purely jurisdictional grounds, namely that the NAFTA ISDS mechanism does not permit a foreign investor to bypass or appeal from domestic courts – except in the obviously inapplicable circumstance in Canada of denial of natural justice such as a result of corruption or bias. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
As I have previously noted and questioned, Canada chose not to have this challenge dismissed initially on purely jurisdictional grounds, namely that the NAFTA ISDS mechanism does not permit a foreign investor to bypass or appeal from domestic courts – except in the obviously inapplicable circumstance in Canada of denial of natural justice such as a result of corruption or bias. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:39 pm
The court concluded, and the government conceded, that the warrant provisions of the SCA do not contemplate or permit extraterritorial application. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
His application was denied. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Noting that “[p]roject applicants are encouraged to develop comprehensive transportation management plans” (citing City of Hayward v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Essex County, Docket No. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:08 pm
This post examines a case from the Court of Appeals of Oregon: State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
” (Quoting In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1161-1162.) [read post]
