Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF L.P."
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Muirfield Value Partners, L.P., 172 A.3d 346 (Del. 2017) and Dell, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
CHAMPIONS OF THE GIST (ANALYSIS) BRING ON A BIG CHILL ON PRESS FREEDOMS IN TEXAS Using its power to amend the "common law" the homogeneously Republican Texas Supreme Court has seen fit to exempt an entire industry (the legal profession) from the civil tort system by granting it "attorney immunity", but when it comes to a less captive audience, it's a different matter, even when the rights at issue are of constitutional dimensions. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
After the parties and the trial court discussed Build by Owner's discovery-related motions, the trial court asked if there were any other matters to consider. [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:21 pm
Ref-Chem, L.P. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Comment: While the new rule makes good sense as a matter of jurisprudential policy, it also happens to cut both ways (shortening or lengthening the limitations period depending on the nature of the claim and under what theory it is actionable). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
After the case was transferred to the Northern District of Texas, counsel for One Tech filed a motion to dismiss the case based on Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
The matter of d [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
The principal has not committed any independent tortious act that harmed the plaintiff and that renders the employer directly liable for such harm. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
CASH BIZ, L.P. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
In re Labatt Food Servs., L.P. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Arbitration is one favored way to flush little-guy litigants with legitimate grievances out of the civil justice system. [read post]
Rare Partnership Dissolution Decision Applies Deadlock Standard to Dissolution Under Partnership Law
22 Jan 2018, 3:44 am
Justice Bransten construed the claim as brought under Partnership Law § 63(1)(d) and (f), which state that a court may dissolve a partnership where “[a] partner wilfully or persistently commits a breach of the partnership agreement, or otherwise so conducts himself in matters relating to the partnership business that it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in partnership with him,” or “[o]ther circumstances render a dissolution… [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Hill III sought more than $1 billion in damages.In addition to the looming trial date, Hill also faced another complication — previous sanctions by the federal judge for intentionally lying under oath and committing fraud on the court. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
”Rembrandt Vision Techs., L.P. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 4:40 am
Each side claims mistreatment by his adversary and by one component or another of the civil justice system. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:43 am
L.P., Release No. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
So why should the former be a matter of arbitrability properly passed on by the Court, but the latter a matter to be arbitrated (rather than a threshold matter of whether an arbitration referral is (still) appropriate, or has been forfeited by undue delay? [read post]
