Search for: "INFANTES V. STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 1,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2013, 3:13 am
This is followed by an instruction that a prominent statement printed in bold letters of at least 3mm in height stating “USE UNDER MEDICAL SUPERVISION” shall also appear on the label. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:24 pm
The applicable standard for claims under all three statutes was notice pleading under Rule 8(a).The purchasers alleged that Abbott misled consumers as to the safety of Similac through the following affirmative statements: (1) Similac is “safe for the consumption by infants”; (2) Abbott was “dedicated to the highest standards of manufacturing and marketing—and to complying with all applicable laws and regulations”; (3) Similac “provid[es] babies with… [read post]
A Georgia state judge Tuesday overturned Georgia’s Living Infants Fairness and Equality (LIFE) Act, also known as the Heartbeat Bill, ruling it unconstitutional from the time it was drafted. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 5:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm by Diana L. Skaggs
Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Commonwealth of Kentucky, in the interest of C.K.A., an infant No. 2012-CA-000590-ME and C.F.A. v. [read post]