Search for: "In Interest of KB" Results 21 - 40 of 377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
’” “Conflicts of Interest under Conditional Fee Agreements” — “Two recent cases reveal that conflicts of interest can arise at the settlement stage of a claim, particularly where a Conditional Fee Agreement (‘CFA’) applies. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Last month in the courts On Monday 18 December 2023, there were applications in the case of KB-2023-001023 Piepenbrock v Michell and others before Tipples J. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Henry P Yang
This is Trial E, one of the six related trials between Optis and Apple. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
The court held that Master McCloud was entitled to reach the conclusion that it was not in the interests of justice to make such an order. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
The case of Beaman v ARTS Ltd [1949] 1 KB 550 explored the question of whether fraud was a necessary allegation in order to constitute a cause of action under the LA 1939, s 26, holding that fraudulent concealment “may acquire its character as such from the very manner in which that act is performed”. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
In his judgment in Davidoff v Google LLC ([2023] EWHC 1958 (KB)) Nicklin J has comprehensively restated the principles to be applied on Norwich Pharmacal applications, emphasising the importance of balancing the Convention rights of the applicant and those of the alleged wrongdoer. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
The application to lift the stay on the KB claim was declined, but was not struck out as an abuse of process. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
  She points out that the court held that 90% of the publications that Mr Banks sued over were held to be lawful public interest speech. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 5:55 am by Shahed Ghoreishi
During a visit to Washington last month, Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman (KBS) assured the Biden administration that, despite the worsening war in the Gaza Strip, his government remains interested in opening diplomatic relations with Israel once the war in Gaza is over. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 1 November, J Johnson handed down judgement of preliminary issues in the case of Clarke v Guardian [2023] EWHC 2734 (KB). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) and Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB) both centred on allegations, published online by the Defendants, that the Claimants had committed acts of sexual violence. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
  Ritchie J also reiterated that the important public interest test is entirely separate from ‘things the public is interested in’. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Defamation lawyers had hoped that the Supreme Court’s judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27 (see our blog here) would provide some much-needed clarity on how section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 should be interpreted. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
On 17 October 2023 Linden J handed down judgment in the case of Ijaz v Manan [2023] EWHC 2574 (KB). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Mr Stones’ defences of truth and publication on matter of public interest were rejected. 5RB has a summary here. [read post]