Search for: "In Re: A.A.-1, and A.A.-2"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 4:32 pm
A.a. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
" We affirm.[1]I. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
" We affirm.[1]I. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Any attempt to characterize such a pattern of behavior as witness bribery must answer two basic questions: (1) are the medical witnesses being paid for expert services, rather than the content of their testimony; and (2) would awarding relief in this case establish a wide-ranging precedent under which legitimate experts would be chilled from rendering opinions and litigants’ access to the courts correspondingly restricted. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Mahmoud and Jackson argue that this conduct violates:• Section 1692e(2), which prohibits "false[ly] represent[ing] . . . the character, amount, or legal status of any debt";• Section 1692e(5), which prohibits "threat[ening] to take any action that cannot legally be taken";• Section 1692e(10), which prohibits "us[ing] . . . false representation[s] or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect any debt or to obtain information concerning a… [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
, 460 U.S. 1, 25 (1983)). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:02 pm
“GMO health risks,”[1] “The sweet lowdown: Exposing the unhealthy truth about sugar,”[2] “Is high-fructose corn syrup bad for you? [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
One such example is the third edition’s treatment of confidence intervals.[1] The “DNA Identification” chapter noted that the meaning of a confidence interval is subtle,[2] but I doubt that the authors, David Kaye and George Sensabaugh, actually found it subtle or difficult. [read post]
