Search for: "In Re: Appointment to Committee on Rules of Evidence" Results 21 - 40 of 739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2022, 7:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
You’re not supposed to peek out to see whether your patron was pleased with what you’re doing. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The rules committee has amended Rule 26(a)(2)(B) to limit expert disclosures to "facts or data" (not the broader term "information") that the witness considered. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am by Schachtman
  This MDL collapsed after 1999, when court-appointed experts and then the Institute of Medicine declared that the scientific evidence did not support plaintiffs’ causal claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:05 pm by Lawfare Editors
Nov. 11, 2016: Nunes announces his appointment to the Trump transition team, advising on the appointments of cabinet members and other administration leadership. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:45 am by John Elwood
But for law nerds like me, the Cordray appointment means there may actually be a court ruling on this interesting (and under-explored) subject. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm by Hilary Hurd, Benjamin Wittes
Support Lawfare Following these rules, the managers—led, say, by Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff—will have alerted the Senate that they’re ready to present the articles, and Julie Adams, the secretary of the Senate, will have responded that the Senate will receive them. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:42 am by Scott Riddle
Scott has represented Chapter 7 and 11 debtors, creditors, creditor committees, trustees, court-appointed receivers and other interested parties in bankruptcy cases and bankruptcy litigation. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Kluwer Patent bloggerIt is self-evident that the Unitary Patent system is good for Europe. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Stephen Bates
  It’s conceivable, though a long-shot, that Mueller could prepare the Impeachment Report and accompanying evidence without including material covered by Rule 6(e). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:12 pm by Judge Bonnie Sudderth
She has contributed more than 30 articles to the Tarrant County Bar Bulletin from 2005 to 2008 on topics related to the Texas Rules of Evidence. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 1:42 pm
With the consent of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee and defendant Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., the Court hereby appoints John D. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 12:40 pm by Andrew Delaney
Anywho, NEPBA urged the Board to apply the standard governing motions to dismiss under the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (12(b)(6) if you’re curious). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 9:10 am by velvel
More generally, the Court is concerned that much of ‘the evidence’ that the parties proffered on summary judgment did not comport with the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
” How could the Senate exercise this desired independence as an appointed body? [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by John Floyd
After telling the committee he had “pressing business” in New Jersey, he left the committee without finishing the questioning. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 9:52 am by Gritsforbreakfast
MORE: See a discussion of this case from Evidence Prof Blog.Strict Harris DIVERT rules sending more DWI defendants to trial? [read post]