Search for: "In Re: Breast Implant Product Liability Litigation"
Results 21 - 40
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
” Apparently, the APHA was not, and is not, concerned with the emboldening the litigation industry and its efforts to subvert the truth-finding function of civil litigation. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
We have to admit that we’re scratching out heads about a recent decision out of Alabama that – contrary to everything else we’ve seen – concluded that the manufacturer of a branded drug could be liable in a case where it never sold the generic product that was all the plaintiff every took and thereby (allegedly) suffered injury.It’s not like this issue hasn’t been litigated before in Alabama.The first Alabama case we know of to consider… [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:54 am
Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability Litigation (Duron), 2007 WL 1725289 (D. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
” The late Judge Sam Pointer, appointed to preside over MDL 926, In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Litigation, Master File No. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
The approach has been used in many cases ranging from exposure to toxic chemicals like, Agent Orange and asbestos, to products liability cases involving medical drugs and devices, such as the Dalkon shield and breast implants. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
The approach has been used in many cases ranging from exposure to toxic chemicals like, Agent Orange and asbestos, to products liability cases involving medical drugs and devices, such as the Dalkon shield and breast implants. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
The approach has been used in many cases ranging from exposure to toxic chemicals like, Agent Orange and asbestos, to products liability cases involving medical drugs and devices, such as the Dalkon shield and breast implants. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm
See In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 647 F. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:29 am
The original Breast Implant settlement collapsed because too many plaintiffs opted out the class action settlement. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Prescriber's claim for economic harm from negative publicity about breast implants he implanted isnot sufficient injury in tort or warranty.In re Minnesota Breast Implant Litigation, 36 F. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:44 am
Incredibily, he was involved in several other big hits: breast implant litigation, the tobacco settlement, drug manufacturing cases, even the Pan Am crash over Lockerbie Scotland. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:04 am
He's tried three cases since January 1, 2000: a damages-only retrial in a case over the value of a piece of African art; the Dow Corning tax litigation, over the appropriate tax treatment of costs incurred defending breast implant claims; and a product liability wrongful death case.It's a shame you can't see each other's reactions to that disclosure. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
Id. at 1313.A classic "type one" mass tort example of the "you failed to warn about something else" claim arose in In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation, 331 F. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The important divide between regulatory practice and the litigation of causal claims in civil actions arises from the theoretical nature of the risk assessment enterprise. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
"That raises our question: How should a drug or device company respond to a consumer complaint about a product liability issue in Canada? [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am
We have seen litigation involving cancer, breast cancer, heart attacks, strokes, breast implants, severe mental illness and more. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am
Rev. de novo 1, 14 (2009) (“[t]he breast implant litigation was largely based on a litigation fraud. [read post]
