Search for: "In Re: Owens Corning"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In a memorandum opinion and order issued on March 27, 2024, in In re Yellow Corporation, et. al., Judge Craig T. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:20 am
- What do you do if you're "hit" by a data breach? [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:00 pm
Meanwhile, the Owens Corning trust values that same diagnosis at about $215,000. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am
“You’re not going to find it! [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:43 am
As noted in In re Owens Corning, 419 F.3d 195 (3d Cir. 2005), substantive consolidation can be justified where the movant shows that the entities disregarded their separateness so significantly that their creditors relied on the breakdown of entity borders, or that the entities caused their assets and liabilities to be so scrambled that separating them is prohibitive and hurts all creditors. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:06 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 971 F.2d 37 (7th Cir. 1992) (defendants’ practices of maintaining price lists for products and of announcing price increases 30 to 60 days before their effective date did not amount to an improper information exchange; discounts were widely used in the industry, making the price lists a poor candidate to coordinate pricing; publicly pre-announcing price increases served a legitimate purpose because customers, who were mostly rehandlers and… [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:47 am
After all, in another context, a creative fusion of branding elements led to Owens-Corning overcoming “well-settled” law against color trademarks, when O-C linked its pink-insulation advertising campaign to the beloved Pink Panther cartoon. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 11:15 pm
In re General Technologies, Inc., Serial Nos. 77052472 and 77052485 (July 23, 2009) [not precedential].Of course, the Supreme Court has told us that a single color cannot be an inherently distinctive mark. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
The Federal Multi-District Silicosis Proceedings Before Judge Janis Jack One of the most significant developments in the role of scientific and medical evidence gatekeeping under Rule 702, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert,[1] was the 2005 opinion of Judge Janis Graham Jack in the multi-district silicosis litigation.[2] Judge Jack’s lengthy opinion addresses a variety of procedural issues, including subject matter jurisdiction over some of the cases, but Her Honor’s focus… [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., No. [read post]
Precedential No. 2: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Proposed Multi-Color Mark for Breakfast Cereals
9 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
See In re Owens-Corning, 227 USPQ 417, 424 (Fed. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 10:55 pm
Let’s not forget where this whole single color trademark ownership concept started, with Owens-Corning and the color pink for fibrous glass building insulation, remember the Pink Panther campaign? [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal… [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 12:13 am
US courts have seen a plethora such cases-the first being In Re Owens-corning FiberglassCorporation, where the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that in limited circumstances, a color that has become associated with a specific manufacturer can qualify as a registrable mark. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 618 So.2d 473, 475 (La. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 774 F. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:27 pm
Image Credit: Explora I – Explora Journeys; Paroc – Owens Corning Twitter July 10 P.M. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1050 (1995); In re Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 774 F.2d 1116, 227 USPQ 417 (Fed. [read post]
