Search for: "In Re: Schering Plough Corp."
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2009, 12:10 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., No. 05-273, 2006 WL 1358441 (U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
See In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm
Moreover, given the Third Circuit’s intervening standing decision in In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm
Moreover, given the Third Circuit’s intervening standing decision in In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
” In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 10:42 am
Cir. 2001), and applied by the FTC in an administrative proceeding – In re Schering-Plough Corp., F.T.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
737 F.Supp.2d at 922-23 (citing In re Schering–Plough Corp. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld in Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:26 pm
Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:56 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 367 N.J. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
See In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1989); In re Bexar County Health Facility Development Corp. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
In re Schering Plo [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:40 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339,1345 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 7:02 am
The same Bloomberg article also re-caps the most recent (albeit a bit dated) information about the extent of this ongoing Fosamax litigation: Merck, which is buying rival Schering-Plough Corp., had a reserve of about $24 million for the litigation, including lawyers' fees, as of March 31, having spent $9 million on the cases in the first quarter, the company said in May. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:00 pm
EVP and general counsel, Schering-Plough. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 1:15 am
Merck, which is buying rival Schering-Plough Corp., had a reserve of about $24 million for the litigation, including lawyers' fees, as of March 31, having spent $9 million on the cases in the first quarter, the company said in May. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:33 am
This too is not new ground, see In re Schering-Plough Corp., Intron/Temodar Consumer Class Action, 2009 WL 2043604 (D.N.J. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
"They're drivers that knowingly speed. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
” In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
