Search for: "In Re Adoption of Clark"
Results 21 - 40
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2023, 5:35 am
Managing relationships proactively and with genuine interest tells your customers they’re at the heart of what you do. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Journal of Free Speech Law] Previously, I blogged the abstract, introduction, and Part I of my new article, Taxing Nudity: Discriminatory Taxes, Secondary Effects, and Tiers of Scrutiny, which has just been published in the Journal of Free Speech Law. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
They’re imperfect as a predictor, but pretty darn good. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:58 am
“Thousands of companies have decided to adopt oneNDA,” Clark told me. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
The court held that the law likely violated the First Amendment: Deciding whether Act 689 is content-based or content-neutral turns on the reasons the State gives for adopting the Act. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
While widespread adoption of AI in legal is coming, though the timeline is uncertain. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
The House of Representatives adopted one article of impeachment:"incitement of insurrection. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court filings, place new recusal standards on the justices, and require the court to adopt a code of ethics. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent article in the Yale Journal on Regulation, Aneil Kovvali of the Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Joshua C. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
The analysis in Bloomberg was conducted under the rubric of the tort of misuse of private information; and there has been no Irish case either expressly adopting that tort or coming to the same conclusion as the UK Supreme Court did in that case. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
But since 1890, the majority explained, Mississippi voters had re-enacted the disenfranchisement provision twice – in 1950 and 1968 – and the challengers do not contend that the 1968 amendment was motivated by an intent to discriminate. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
He continues to repeat the mantra of “trust us, we’re the government,” long after that trust has been lost with many citizens. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 1:44 pm
Due to these alarming rates, Clark County implemented a mandatory vaccination policy for food service workers. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:18 pm
Due to these alarming rates, Clark County implemented a mandatory vaccination policy for food service workers. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:15 pm
Due to these alarming rates, Clark County implemented a mandatory vaccination policy for food service workers. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
As a starting point, consider the following plainspoken language from the California Supreme Court in In re: Kay (a case on which Dean Martinez’s letter also draws): [The government] retains a legitimate concern in ensuring that some individuals’ unruly assertion of their rights of free expression does not imperil other citizens’ rights of free association and discussion. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:07 pm
Due to these alarming rates, Clark County implemented a mandatory vaccination policy for food service workers. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Rohlf, professor at Lewis & Clark Law School, and Colin Reynolds, project manager at Wildlands Network, argued that federal agencies should broaden their interpretations of the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
They’re a bracing read, in part because of the smug self-assuredness of Eastman’s prose: “BOLD, Certainly,” Eastman concludes of his scheme in the Jan. 3 memo. [read post]
